<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford Considers Extending Ranger&#8217;s Life</title>
	<link>http://www.fordmuscle.com/blog/ford-considers-extending-rangers-life/112295</link>
	<description>fordmuscle.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Ford Considers Extending Ranger&#8217;s Life by: rangerman1</title>
		<link>http://www.fordmuscle.com/blog/ford-considers-extending-rangers-life/112295#comment-28230</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fordmuscle.com/blog/ford-considers-extending-rangers-life/112295#comment-28230</guid>
					<description>I own a 2001 ranger 4x4 4.0 and love the truck,hate the french made transmission tho.Ive seen a high of 26 mpg onthe highway if you keep it under 60mph and average about 16-17 in town,just keep the tires aired up around 37psi.
I like the size of this truck and really don't want to see it any bigger,maybe wider for more stablity,and richer interiors and I'd be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I own a 2001 ranger 4&#215;4 4.0 and love the truck,hate the french made transmission tho.Ive seen a high of 26 mpg onthe highway if you keep it under 60mph and average about 16-17 in town,just keep the tires aired up around 37psi.<br />
I like the size of this truck and really don&#8217;t want to see it any bigger,maybe wider for more stablity,and richer interiors and I&#8217;d be happy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
