|
Got the Cammer Fever
<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2004-10-09 03:26, 64 TBOLT wrote:
if it had a cam on each head(thats two cams) wouldnt it be a DOHC[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img][img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_razz.gif[/img][img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_eek.gif[/img]
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>
I used to think the same thing!![img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_lol.gif[/img] But as it was told to me, manufacturers desribe a lot of things by the single side when it comes to the top end...I always thought it should be considered a DOHC, since there are two cams. But I don't care how it's called, I think it's an impressive piece of engineering. Actually saw a picture once of a gear drive set up for the cammer[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_eek.gif[/img] looked like the inside of a watch with all the gears on it[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_lol.gif[/img]
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Humphrey351 on 10/9/04 8:02pm ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Humphrey351 on 10/9/04 8:03pm ]</font>
|