Tech Archives Project Cars Readers Cars Forums FordMuscle Store Feature Cars
pix
pix
Membership
pix
FORDMUSCLE.com FordMuscle Nav

Go Back   FordMuscle.com Forums > General Forums > All Ford Techboard

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
06-13-2002, 09:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
lenh
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 153
393 stroker info

i just ordered a stroker crank and have had 351w block bored and prepped getting ready to build a stroker 393 looking for around 500 hp anyone built this engine sure would very much appreciate any tips or specs you can share. sure would be nice if fordmuscle could do a feature on this build hear its getting very popular due to low cost and easy hp thanks[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif[/img]
lenh is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising


   
06-13-2002, 09:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Mayberry
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 103
393 stroker info

Try here. This is the exact one I am building. Well, almost the exact one.

http://www.trickflow.com/articles/st..._st_2_body.htm

_________________


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Mayberry on 6/14/02 9:53am ]</font>
Mayberry is offline   Reply With Quote
06-13-2002, 10:36 PM   #3 (permalink)
mavman
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,745
393 stroker info

I have done it as well. 505 HP @ 6600 525 lb-ft @ 4200. Quite easy to build I must say, for a stroker. I've helped with a few 430 inch bowties, and the 393 is a breeze compared to those. You might or might not have to grind the rods near the rodbolt area to gain clearance between the cam lobes and the rod, but that's the most time consuming part of the whole deal. Just dont forget, the 393's are nearing big-block displacement, so make sure the intake/exhaust/cylinder heads are up the the challenge. Also, something to think about, some people have had to add mallory metal to balance the crank, but my crank man says that it's due to heavy pistons. Use of lighter pistons will eliminate that problem. I used SRP's, they were 514 grams without the pin. We just barely had to remove metal one the front and rear counterweight to balance but that was all. We used a SCAT crank and am very happy with it--all the journals were spot on and the counterweights are rounded on the leading edges. Very nice piece for it's price. you will have to use an early 28 oz flywheel and damper.
mavman is offline   Reply With Quote
06-13-2002, 10:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
R Code
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 737
393 stroker info

The KB 393 pistons are also light and required no mallory metal on RPM's 393.


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: R Code on 6/14/02 9:58am ]</font>
R Code is offline   Reply With Quote
06-14-2002, 12:31 AM   #5 (permalink)
654212spd
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 207
393 stroker info

I made that much horsepower with a 351 which I drove on the street only on weekends so a 393 should be alot easier to get that power
654212spd is offline   Reply With Quote
06-14-2002, 02:52 AM   #6 (permalink)
twiddler
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 58
393 stroker info

here is a great article on the 392 ford crate where Westech just added AFR 185 heads (milled down a touch for compression) and went with Comp Cam XR292R. Over 500HP at the flywheel. pages 2 and 3 are missing but 1,4,5 are there

http://www.westechperformance.com/pa...s/75hpmag.html



Andy
twiddler is offline   Reply With Quote
06-15-2002, 07:16 AM   #7 (permalink)
lenh
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 153
393 stroker info

thanks for the info guys i am wanting to use a set of stock heads that i will port can someone shed some light on best stock heads to port for this engine i know aftermarket is best however trying to keep cost down. what year and casting number would you recommend thanks again for info[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]
[addsig]
lenh is offline   Reply With Quote
06-15-2002, 07:19 AM   #8 (permalink)
lenh
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 153
393 stroker info

<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2002-06-15 06:16, lenh wrote:
thanks for the info guys i am wanting to use a set of stock heads that i will port can someone shed some light on best stock heads to port for this engine i know aftermarket is best however trying to keep cost down. what year and casting number would you recommend thanks again for info[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>
[addsig]
lenh is offline   Reply With Quote
06-15-2002, 08:44 AM   #9 (permalink)
mstngjoe
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,386
393 stroker info

Most people would recommend C9OE or D0OE 351W heads for a stock head on that motor. Since cost is a concern you might want to check out www.powerheads.com. Good stuff priced reasonably.

Good luck.
[addsig]
mstngjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
06-15-2002, 09:46 PM   #10 (permalink)
lenh
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 153
393 stroker info

thanks for info mstngjoe i will be looking for these heads to port,anyone else have some tricks they used to gain more hp from a 393 stroker[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif[/img]

_________________

if they built it right the first time there would be no recalls
85 Mazda RX7 powered by 5.0 HO engine AOD tranny
soon to be running 393 power


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: lenh on 6/16/02 8:48am ]</font>
lenh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
pixblue
CHP