<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2005-01-25 21:42, gork1rogues wrote:
This is what I did, do not know if you are talking about the same thing. It is only held on by two bolts now. What I did was enlarge the holes that needed to be used to mount it in the position as shown to fit the bolts that would be used. Since the mounting is triangular in design with two sides being equal it allows it to work this way. Also had to grind a bit off of the top of the now unused mounting hole to allow for valve cover clearance. Standard rotation WP with a ribbed pulley from an 80s 2.3l non-ac and crank pulley from a non-HO 5.0.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: gork1rogues on 1/26/05 9:46am ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: gork1rogues on 1/26/05 9:47am ]</font>
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>I actually meant reversig the insides to reverse the tension.And yet keep it in the same location.Basically instead of pushing down on the belt i wanted to push up on it.
[addsig]