Tech Department Project Cars FM Store FMWire ReadersCars Feature Cars Forums Log in About FordMuscle
pix
FordMuscle WebMagazine - Home
FordMuscle Home
FordMuscle Login
Subscribe

Go Back   FordMuscle.com Forums > General Forums > All Ford Techboard

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
11-23-2007, 05:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
samsonhusky
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11
opinions on cam, intake, head. combo

would like some opinions on this combo. gt-40 heads, weiand stealth intake, e303 cam,
holley 600 carb, stock 85 5.0 short block with after market shorty headers. t-5 trans with 3.55 gears. Was wondering if this would be a good combo.
samsonhusky is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising


   
11-23-2007, 05:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
gork1rogues
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 862
Re: opinions on cam, intake, head. combo

Personally I would ditch the cam in favor of something designed more for a carbureted setup.
______________________________________
11.31@120 N/A 347 AOD 65 Falcon
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
gork1rogues is offline   Reply With Quote
11-23-2007, 06:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
retyler
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,531
Re: opinions on cam, intake, head. combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by samsonhusky View Post
would like some opinions on this combo. gt-40 heads, weiand stealth intake, e303 cam,
holley 600 carb, stock 85 5.0 short block with after market shorty headers. t-5 trans with 3.55 gears. Was wondering if this would be a good combo.
Can't see much wrong with it. I'll be going that route with World products W senior heads. If and when I get the block back from the machine shop. Hunting season puts a hold on everything.

I don't know how the cam will work, I'm using it because I have one I used in a motor years ago. I found it up on a shelf one day while doing some re-arranging.
______________________________________
"Tell it like it is or don't tell it at all" 1964 Falcon 2dr HT, 347V8 4V, dual exhaust, 5sp, pwr assist R&P steering, AM radio, heater with defrost and 2sp fan, electric windshield wipers, cigar lighter, dlx light group, bucket seats, console and full carpet.
retyler is offline   Reply With Quote
11-23-2007, 06:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
plovett
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 190
Re: opinions on cam, intake, head. combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by samsonhusky View Post
would like some opinions on this combo. gt-40 heads, weiand stealth intake, e303 cam,
holley 600 carb, stock 85 5.0 short block with after market shorty headers. t-5 trans with 3.55 gears. Was wondering if this would be a good combo.
Looks like a good combo to me.

In my opinion the E303 cam is would be a good carburetor cam. It has a 110 degree lobe separation angle like many "carb cams". A typical oem 'EFI cam" would have 114-115 degree or greater lobe separation angle. A wide lobe separation angle is great for keeping the engine computer happy, but not so good for max power. So I think the E303 is good for a carb'ed motor.

Again, in my opinion, anything you spend improving the cylinder heads will be well worth it. That could mean getting your GT40's ported or getting some really good aftermarket heads instead. It's really hard to overestimate the impact of the cylinder heads, even on a mild engine.

paulie
______________________________________
1967 Cougar. 517 hp. 432 cid FE. C6, 9 inch rear.
plovett is offline   Reply With Quote
11-24-2007, 12:13 AM   #5 (permalink)
gork1rogues
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 862
Re: opinions on cam, intake, head. combo

I suppose I should have phrased it as 'go with a more modern camshaft design'... Memory bank served me wrong on the LSA of the E-cam, but it still has relatively slow ramp rates compared to what else is available... If you have it, use it, if not, consider something else.
______________________________________
11.31@120 N/A 347 AOD 65 Falcon
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
gork1rogues is offline   Reply With Quote
11-24-2007, 02:49 AM   #6 (permalink)
plovett
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 190
Re: opinions on cam, intake, head. combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by gork1rogues View Post
I suppose I should have phrased it as 'go with a more modern camshaft design'... Memory bank served me wrong on the LSA of the E-cam, but it still has relatively slow ramp rates compared to what else is available... If you have it, use it, if not, consider something else.
I hear ya. The E303 is not what you'd call state of the art. Not bad though. The spec's are 282/282 degrees advertised, 220/220 degrees @0.050", .498/.498" (I'm assuming with 1.6 rockers) , and 110 LSA.

Luvin' the Falcon by the way. I'd just about kill for a '64-'65 sedan. I like 'em better than the hardtops.

paulie
______________________________________
1967 Cougar. 517 hp. 432 cid FE. C6, 9 inch rear.
plovett is offline   Reply With Quote
11-24-2007, 06:18 AM   #7 (permalink)
samsonhusky
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11
Re: opinions on cam, intake, head. combo

I have all these parts except the intake. Probably use the e303 cam just hoping to get in the 13's with this combo the car is 3200 pounds. Had a 79 capri with 302, edlerbrock perfomer intake, one of the smaller comp xtreme energy cams, holley 600, e7 heads, shorty headers, c4 trans with 2000 stall, 3.73 gears that was fun on the freeway, With that combo I run a whopping 14.5 @ 88mph.

thanks for the input
samsonhusky is offline   Reply With Quote
11-24-2007, 09:37 AM   #8 (permalink)
gork1rogues
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 862
Re: opinions on cam, intake, head. combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by plovett View Post
I hear ya. The E303 is not what you'd call state of the art. Not bad though. The spec's are 282/282 degrees advertised, 220/220 degrees @0.050", .498/.498" (I'm assuming with 1.6 rockers) , and 110 LSA.

Luvin' the Falcon by the way. I'd just about kill for a '64-'65 sedan. I like 'em better than the hardtops.

paulie
Thanks, it looks even better now with the Centerline Telstar wheels on it instead of the probe wheels, but now the paint is finally starting to show its age and low quality (maaco, previous owner) and chip off. Keep on dedicating too much time and money to drivetrain work instead of working on the body.

The combo you have laid out should be a pretty solid 13 second combo. Just make sure you put some money towards drag oriented tires and suspension.
______________________________________
11.31@120 N/A 347 AOD 65 Falcon
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
gork1rogues is offline   Reply With Quote
11-25-2007, 03:35 PM   #9 (permalink)
maverick5oh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 73
Re: opinions on cam, intake, head. combo

good combo for the street on a low buget. I have the E-303 in a 92 roller eng. off a mustang in my maverick and it sounds nice at idle with hooker headers, 2.5 inch pipes, flowmasters 40, RPM intake,E7 heads,holley 600,a 8" 2.79 peg leg and complete dura-spark ignition. It's decent on gas, and does't requierer high octane gas the way it is tuned now and with gas prices going thru the roof, it fits the bill for now as a daily driver !!!!
maverick5oh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opinions/Guesses on new combo Hardtimes All Ford Techboard 5 10-23-2007 12:53 PM
Need your opinions on my combo and options sportsroof1970 All Ford Techboard 4 11-11-2006 02:01 AM
Opinions comments on new combo Bamm-Bamm All Ford Techboard 14 11-06-2006 08:41 AM
Opinions please on my new engine combo lovemyHO All Ford Techboard 7 12-20-2004 08:03 PM
Please give your opinions on this combo dw All Ford Techboard 4 10-28-2004 08:24 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
pixblue
Lakewood
Stock Appearing Drag Racing

All content © FordMuscle, LLC. | Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. | FordMuscle.com is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.