Tech Department Project Cars FM Store FMWire ReadersCars Feature Cars Forums Log in About FordMuscle
pix
FordMuscle WebMagazine - Home
FordMuscle Home
FordMuscle Login
Subscribe

Go Back   FordMuscle.com Forums > General Forums > All Ford Techboard

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
02-20-2008, 11:46 AM   #1 (permalink)
LPfanatic87
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wilson NC
Posts: 15
1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

Hey there,

I'll cut right to the chase, my Dad has a '69 mustang fastback and the guy who restored it put an 86 or so GT 302 engine and other stuff in it to make it work (bellhousing, torque converter, harmonic balancer, etc.) My Dad recently contacted the guy and got the original '69 engine (302) and we plan on restoring that and beefing it up a little.

I was wondering what all would be required to put the original engine back into the car. I know the harmonic balancer, torque converter, bellhousing would need to be recplaced but what other things would need to be done.

Also about the original motor, we plan on upgrading the cam and heads on the car, what other stuff would need to be replaced to make this possible. Would there need to be a different harmonic balancer, or distributor, or bigger carb or..? We want to make it a mean street car but not so absurd to make it where we would have to upgrade the transmission or anything like that.
LPfanatic87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising


   
02-20-2008, 11:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
FEandGoingBroke
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,909
Re: 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

Listen up LP {I'm a 78 fan but LP's are ok if you find the right ones }, your COMPLETE 302 does not need a harmonic balancer... That should STILL be on the 302.

All you need are the original motor mounts and original tranny bell housing, the original flywheel and torque convertor... The rest is already there. OH, you will need the throttle cable and kickdown stuff from the original setup as well, unless they are still the same.

Porting the heads and going with hedders and a nice 4V intake and a cam will get you into enough HP that you won't get walked away from too often, and will run real nice without costing a lot.



FE
______________________________________
<a href=http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=114102&dateline=1214880004 target=_blank>http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/ima...ine=1214880004</a>

Let us bow our heads and Murff
FEandGoingBroke is online now   Reply With Quote
02-21-2008, 08:02 AM   #3 (permalink)
FEandGoingBroke
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,909
Re: 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

Wow this thread went dead quick...
______________________________________
<a href=http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=114102&dateline=1214880004 target=_blank>http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/ima...ine=1214880004</a>

Let us bow our heads and Murff
FEandGoingBroke is online now   Reply With Quote
02-21-2008, 11:16 AM   #4 (permalink)
wcj56
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Roy, UT
Posts: 311
Re: 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

86GT would be a roller cam motor and IMHO would be the better build. I doubt anybody is going to crawl under and look at the numbers on the side of the block. You can use the same bell and torque converter with either block, you would just need to use a 164 tooth 28oz flexplate from a 351 windsor with the 69 block. Stock heads on either motor are junk without serious port work that would cost you as much as a good set new. Again its only my opinion but roller cams are more efficient and much less trouble on break in.
______________________________________
69 Mustang 331cu in DSS level 20
TFS track heat, DSS rockers, lift:.573 .276, Bigs 750, MSD 6AL & billet dizzy, B&M 174 @7psi, AOD 3.5k stall, 9" 4.11
wcj56 is offline   Reply With Quote
02-21-2008, 11:38 AM   #5 (permalink)
LPfanatic87
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wilson NC
Posts: 15
Re: 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

Quote:
Originally Posted by FEandGoingBroke View Post
Wow this thread went dead quick...
Thanks for your help first off. The problem with the original motor to begin with is that it was knocking so the guy took most of the stuff off like the harmonic balancer and what not so my Dad has to track that stuff down. So we figured instead of tryin to fix the knocking problem, to go ahead and beef it up seeing how the internal stuff nees to be fixed. Im not to smart when it comes to internal engine parts and all that but my Dad and I will try and build a decent motor.
LPfanatic87 is offline   Reply With Quote
02-21-2008, 11:40 AM   #6 (permalink)
LPfanatic87
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wilson NC
Posts: 15
Re: 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

Quote:
Originally Posted by wcj56 View Post
86GT would be a roller cam motor and IMHO would be the better build. I doubt anybody is going to crawl under and look at the numbers on the side of the block. You can use the same bell and torque converter with either block, you would just need to use a 164 tooth 28oz flexplate from a 351 windsor with the 69 block. Stock heads on either motor are junk without serious port work that would cost you as much as a good set new. Again its only my opinion but roller cams are more efficient and much less trouble on break in.
Thank you for your help. I talked with my Dad last night to make sure the information about the car is right. The engine that is in it now is actually an 85 GT motor, the last year they put the carbs in the mustang. Would there be any difference in the motor in it when it comes to roller cams?
LPfanatic87 is offline   Reply With Quote
02-21-2008, 07:45 PM   #7 (permalink)
wcj56
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Roy, UT
Posts: 311
Re: 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

If it is truely an 85GT block then yes it would be the first year of the roller cams in Mustangs. Late 85 was actually available with fuel injection. I still think your better off with the roller motor for a build. The ford roller lifters are actually pretty good and short of having damage are reusable. Roller cams are pretty cheap anymore and require no special break in. You can retrofit the 69 block to a roller cam but the expense is much higher. You already have everything for the 85 50 oz block why not use it? The only reason to use the 69 block is if you are going to compete in MCA stock class which is a whole nother ball game.
______________________________________
69 Mustang 331cu in DSS level 20
TFS track heat, DSS rockers, lift:.573 .276, Bigs 750, MSD 6AL & billet dizzy, B&M 174 @7psi, AOD 3.5k stall, 9" 4.11
wcj56 is offline   Reply With Quote
02-23-2008, 12:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
LPfanatic87
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wilson NC
Posts: 15
Re: 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

Quote:
Originally Posted by wcj56 View Post
If it is truely an 85GT block then yes it would be the first year of the roller cams in Mustangs. Late 85 was actually available with fuel injection. I still think your better off with the roller motor for a build. The ford roller lifters are actually pretty good and short of having damage are reusable. Roller cams are pretty cheap anymore and require no special break in. You can retrofit the 69 block to a roller cam but the expense is much higher. You already have everything for the 85 50 oz block why not use it? The only reason to use the 69 block is if you are going to compete in MCA stock class which is a whole nother ball game.
I talked with my Dad just a couple of minutes ago and he said the he would rebuild the original 302 back to original state and wants to take the 85 GT block and beef that up with a 331 stroker kit. He doesnt want a drag car but would like a nice mean street legal engine thats got some bark behind it. He needs to know everything needed to do this including the stuff not related to the inside of the engine like the torque converter and stuff like that. I appreciate your help with this and your car looks awesome.
LPfanatic87 is offline   Reply With Quote
02-23-2008, 06:26 PM   #9 (permalink)
wcj56
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Roy, UT
Posts: 311
Re: 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

Okay here is what I would do. If you want to be able to use both motors. Order the 331 stroker kit in a 28oz imbalance. Purchase a 28oz balancer and 164 tooth flexplate that will work on both motors and be able to use the same tranny. Rebuild the stock 69 first and get it installed then build the 331 85 block after that. This way you are never without a good motor in the car. What you have right now is 50oz imbalance which will be useless when your done with both builds. you will be fine but if it were me I would buy two 28oz balancers cause they are a pain to change from motor to motor.
______________________________________
69 Mustang 331cu in DSS level 20
TFS track heat, DSS rockers, lift:.573 .276, Bigs 750, MSD 6AL & billet dizzy, B&M 174 @7psi, AOD 3.5k stall, 9" 4.11
wcj56 is offline   Reply With Quote
02-24-2008, 07:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
LPfanatic87
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wilson NC
Posts: 15
Re: 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback 302

Quote:
Originally Posted by wcj56 View Post
Okay here is what I would do. If you want to be able to use both motors. Order the 331 stroker kit in a 28oz imbalance. Purchase a 28oz balancer and 164 tooth flexplate that will work on both motors and be able to use the same tranny. Rebuild the stock 69 first and get it installed then build the 331 85 block after that. This way you are never without a good motor in the car. What you have right now is 50oz imbalance which will be useless when your done with both builds. you will be fine but if it were me I would buy two 28oz balancers cause they are a pain to change from motor to motor.
Sweet, so other than the balancers, what other things would needed to be changed out (torque converter, etc)? Upgrading it to a 331, will I need to get a different type of distributor or should the stock one be fine? Also will I need to get new headers or should the ones on their match up?
LPfanatic87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1969 Ford Galaxie XL Fastback Top garyee Wanted 3 01-05-2008 01:10 PM
1969 Mustang Fastback runs and drives darkostoj Vehicles for Sale 2 12-15-2007 08:49 AM
1967 Mustang fastback(390) and 1969 mustang fastback projects $5500 darkostoj Vehicles for Sale 2 11-07-2007 03:30 PM
1969 Mustang Fastback- Fergie Ferguson condor4 The Garage 2 09-01-2007 02:25 PM
1969 mustang fastback sodflyer The Garage 1 02-21-2004 07:41 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
pixblue
Mallory Summer
AirFlowResearch Heads

All content © FordMuscle, LLC. | Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. | FordMuscle.com is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.