Tech Department Project Cars FM Store FMWire ReadersCars Feature Cars Forums Log in About FordMuscle
pix
FordMuscle WebMagazine - Home
FordMuscle Home
FordMuscle Login
Subscribe

Go Back   FordMuscle.com Forums > General Forums > All Ford Techboard

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
04-21-2008, 12:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
pwrcrzy
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
429 CJ Camshaft Good enough??

I'm in the process of re-building my 429 out of my 1970 GT Torino. It has the factory 429 Cobra Jet engine. The original camshaft has long gone. I'm getting ready to put in the replacement but unsure if I'll be happy with it. The local machine recommended it for me, it's a comp cams 270h cam part number 34-229-4. After buying it of course, some people have told me it's not a really good sounding camshaft. Everything is new in the motor, .30 over, CJ heads smoothed out, valve job etc. It's really a big breathing motor and I want a good sound out of it. It does have an automatic tranny so I did not want to have to revamp the converter, but if I hear more and more people tell me to, I will. Has anyone used the camshaft? Any feedback greatly appreciated in advance. I haven't been able to find the original specs of the CJ camshaft that I could decipher. Is this close? When you look for cams it seems there are many many choices.

Thanks again
David
pwrcrzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising


   
04-21-2008, 12:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
dfree383
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,179
Re: 429 CJ Camshaft Good enough??

Check out the Comp Cams XE Line and The Lunati Voodoo line, those are the "Current" grinds of choice for alot of BBF builders.

BBF's like a duration split of about 6-8 degrees, raher than the Single pattern ones.
______________________________________
2008 New Years Resolution "Break into the 15's with a JA Custom Cam"
dfree383 is offline   Reply With Quote
04-21-2008, 01:10 PM   #3 (permalink)
sharpshot71
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lonsdale MN
Posts: 1,597
Re: 429 CJ Camshaft Good enough??

im no expert on cam choice, but what are you looking for? stock sounding/performing engine? or mild street motor? If your just looking for a stock rebuild type thing then go with the stock replacement type cam. If you want more power with a little meaner sound, look for a more agressive cam. If you find one with specs you think you like, post it here and the experts will tell you if you will have problems with the converter or valve springs ect.
sharpshot71 is offline   Reply With Quote
04-21-2008, 07:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
paulkane
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 149
Re: 429 CJ Camshaft Good enough??

Quote:
Originally Posted by pwrcrzy View Post
I'm in the process of re-building my 429 out of my 1970 GT Torino. It has the factory 429 Cobra Jet engine. The original camshaft has long gone. I'm getting ready to put in the replacement but unsure if I'll be happy with it. The local machine recommended it for me, it's a comp cams 270h cam part number 34-229-4. After buying it of course, some people have told me it's not a really good sounding camshaft. Everything is new in the motor, .30 over, CJ heads smoothed out, valve job etc. It's really a big breathing motor and I want a good sound out of it. It does have an automatic tranny so I did not want to have to revamp the converter, but if I hear more and more people tell me to, I will. Has anyone used the camshaft? Any feedback greatly appreciated in advance. I haven't been able to find the original specs of the CJ camshaft that I could decipher. Is this close? When you look for cams it seems there are many many choices.

Thanks again
David
David,

The camshaft you have selected is a straight profile cam, as opposed to a split profile cam. In fact, that cam (34-299-4) is a very early Comp Cams grind that was carried over from their BBC line of camshafts, because back then everyone mistakenly thought that with the 460 Ford copied the BBC. We know better now, and because of this there are better cam grinds that are profiled specifically for the 429/460 engine family.

Since the factory iron heads of the 429/460 engine family have such a poor flowing exhaust port, the exhaust lobe is usually ground with more lift and/or duration so as to help extract the spent exhaust gases. In most cases with a straight profile camshaft (such as what you currently have), a great portion of the exhaust gas is left trapped in the cylinder and dilutes the incoming air/fuel charge.

So, you are better off with a split profile cam. And yes, it will have a more aggressive exhaust note and it will also produce more power in your case. Incidentally, the closest to the original OEM camshaft for your 429CJ engine is Ford Racing's cam, p/n M-6250-A460.

Also, as noted above the CompCams XE family of cams would work better for your build. I would recommend something such as the XE262H (34-238-4). Or believe it or not, for the money the Summit Racing SUM-3501 will work well too.

Paul
______________________________________
http://www.highflowdynamics.com/
paulkane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does anyone know? Camshaft DragRacr Stroker Engines 10 05-06-2006 07:51 PM
282s Camshaft Good Choice? Nitmare67 All Ford Techboard 5 10-13-2004 01:40 PM
camshaft pimpin78 All Ford Techboard 3 02-24-2004 01:13 AM
need camshaft help tonye All Ford Techboard 2 08-19-2002 10:55 PM
What camshaft would be best? meemooer All Ford Techboard 1 04-03-2002 02:12 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
pixblue
Fidanza clutches for Fords

All content © FordMuscle, LLC. | Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. | FordMuscle.com is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.