Tech Department Project Cars FM Store FMWire ReadersCars Feature Cars Forums Log in About FordMuscle
pix
FordMuscle WebMagazine - Home
FordMuscle Home
FordMuscle Login
Subscribe

Go Back   FordMuscle.com Forums > General Forums > All Ford Techboard

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
07-14-2008, 06:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
468hmmr
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 118
360 to 390 conversion.

I'm gonna pull the junkyard motor out of the Howard this winter and do a quicky upgrade. Drop in a 390 crank and rods. What kind of CR will I see reusing the stock 360 pistons and C8 heads?
______________________________________
1965 Galaxie 500 two door hardtop 352
1966 Howard v-drive flatbottom w/
468c.i. Holman Moody medium-riser
HM Weber manifold with 48 IDA\'s
HM 180 degree headers
HM oil pan, oil cooler, etc.
468hmmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising


   
07-14-2008, 06:30 PM   #2 (permalink)
FEandGoingBroke
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,864
Re: 360 to 390 conversion.

depends on the combustion chamber I reckon, probably 9:1 though...

You gotta get diffrent piston's too, the pin height if diffrent from 360 to 390... 390 as has a pin height of 1.66 and the 360 has a 1.76 height, you do not want to hit the head
______________________________________
<a href=http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=114102&dateline=1214880004 target=_blank>http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/ima...ine=1214880004</a>

Let us bow our heads and Murff
FEandGoingBroke is offline   Reply With Quote
07-14-2008, 07:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
n2omike
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,160
Re: 360 to 390 conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FEandGoingBroke View Post
You gotta get diffrent piston's too, the pin height if diffrent from 360 to 390... 390 as has a pin height of 1.66 and the 360 has a 1.76 height, you do not want to hit the head
NO. The 360 and 390 use the exact same replacement pistons. The 360 uses a longer connecting rod.

This is an EXCELLENT conversion! The 360 has crap for compression, and crap for quench! The compression is only around 8:1, and the piston is around 1/8" from the top of the bore at TDC! The 390 conversion adds 30 cubes, bumps the compression up to livable levels, and restores quench by bringing the piston right up to TDC for better efficiency! Chances are, it wil have more power AND get better mileage after the swap.

As a bonus, the ONLY things you need are the 390 crank and rods. Both engines use the same balancers and flywheels... and even the same replacement pistons.

Good Luck!
______________________________________
66 mustang
302 4-speed 289 heads, 10.63 @ 129.3
[url]http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?220[/url]
[img]http://webpages.charter.net/hotrods/stang2.jpg[/img]
[img]http://webpages.charter.net/hotrods/stang3.jpg[/img]
n2omike is offline   Reply With Quote
07-15-2008, 09:30 AM   #4 (permalink)
468hmmr
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 118
Re: 360 to 390 conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by n2omike View Post
NO. The 360 and 390 use the exact same replacement pistons. The 360 uses a longer connecting rod.

This is an EXCELLENT conversion! The 360 has crap for compression, and crap for quench! The compression is only around 8:1, and the piston is around 1/8" from the top of the bore at TDC! The 390 conversion adds 30 cubes, bumps the compression up to livable levels, and restores quench by bringing the piston right up to TDC for better efficiency! Chances are, it wil have more power AND get better mileage after the swap.

As a bonus, the ONLY things you need are the 390 crank and rods. Both engines use the same balancers and flywheels... and even the same replacement pistons.

Good Luck!
That's what I was told too. So what will the final CR end up being? I'd like to stick a cam and springs in it while it's apart and this is an important factor.
______________________________________
1965 Galaxie 500 two door hardtop 352
1966 Howard v-drive flatbottom w/
468c.i. Holman Moody medium-riser
HM Weber manifold with 48 IDA\'s
HM 180 degree headers
HM oil pan, oil cooler, etc.
468hmmr is offline   Reply With Quote
07-15-2008, 10:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
fordmonsta
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 84
Re: 360 to 390 conversion.

right on, cause if i aint mistaken, the 360 uses a 352 crank and rods with a 390 bore, i may be off on this but thats what i remember when i used to screw with FE motors
______________________________________
jesus
fordmonsta is offline   Reply With Quote
07-15-2008, 03:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
plovett
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 190
Re: 360 to 390 conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by n2omike View Post
NO. The 360 and 390 use the exact same replacement pistons. The 360 uses a longer connecting rod.

This is an EXCELLENT conversion! The 360 has crap for compression, and crap for quench! The compression is only around 8:1, and the piston is around 1/8" from the top of the bore at TDC! The 390 conversion adds 30 cubes, bumps the compression up to livable levels, and restores quench by bringing the piston right up to TDC for better efficiency! Chances are, it wil have more power AND get better mileage after the swap.

As a bonus, the ONLY things you need are the 390 crank and rods. Both engines use the same balancers and flywheels... and even the same replacement pistons.

Good Luck!
You sure about that? I think almost all FE's use the same length connecting rod at 6.489". I think there were a very few 352's with a longer rod at 6.52"??? I think it's the pistons and crank that are different not the rods.

I think you need the 390 crank and 390 pistons to make the conversion.

paulie
______________________________________
1967 Cougar. 517 hp. 432 cid FE. C6, 9 inch rear.
plovett is offline   Reply With Quote
07-15-2008, 04:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
n2omike
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,160
Re: 360 to 390 conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by plovett View Post
You sure about that? I think almost all FE's use the same length connecting rod at 6.489". I think there were a very few 352's with a longer rod at 6.52"??? I think it's the pistons and crank that are different not the rods.

I think you need the 390 crank and 390 pistons to make the conversion.

paulie
Very sure. The 360 uses the longer rod. When converting to the 390, the more common shorter rod is used, and is what allows the standard 360/390 piston to be used.

I believe the compression comes in around 9:1, but don't know exactly offhand.
______________________________________
66 mustang
302 4-speed 289 heads, 10.63 @ 129.3
[url]http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?220[/url]
[img]http://webpages.charter.net/hotrods/stang2.jpg[/img]
[img]http://webpages.charter.net/hotrods/stang3.jpg[/img]
n2omike is offline   Reply With Quote
07-15-2008, 07:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
FALCONAROUND
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,298
Re: 360 to 390 conversion.

I am confused now and will have to go to the machine shop in the morning...

I do believe the 360 had a longer rod though...

Thanks Mike, now I got WORK to do
______________________________________
When my Gecko is broken, does that mean I have 'A REPTILE' Dysfunction?
FALCONAROUND is offline   Reply With Quote
07-15-2008, 07:52 PM   #9 (permalink)
Humphrey351
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 590
Re: 360 to 390 conversion.



330, 332, 352, 360, 361 all use the longer 6.540" rod...except the ones with the C3AE-A numbered rods...those ones were the shorter 6.488" rods. Pretty much all the other FE motors used the short rods.

Mike
______________________________________

Last edited by Humphrey351 : 07-15-2008 at 07:55 PM.
Humphrey351 is offline   Reply With Quote
07-15-2008, 08:07 PM   #10 (permalink)
FEandGoingBroke
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,864
Re: 360 to 390 conversion.

Seems to me that you cannot use the same piston for two diffrent rod lengths...

Unless the crank makes up the diffrence in stroke...
______________________________________
<a href=http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=114102&dateline=1214880004 target=_blank>http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/ima...ine=1214880004</a>

Let us bow our heads and Murff
FEandGoingBroke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
efi conversion migg400 Mustang Pages (1965-1973) 5 09-17-2007 08:28 AM
maf conversion whiteboy Mustang Pages (1979-1995) 1 07-12-2006 09:31 AM
EFI conversion matt1190 Mustang Pages (1965-1973) 3 06-28-2006 07:24 AM
EFI conversion coupe3w All Ford Techboard 2 02-15-2005 09:36 PM
T5 to 429/C6 Conversion HHStang All Ford Techboard 7 11-17-2003 10:28 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
pixblue
Holley
Probe Industries
AirFlowResearch Heads

All content © FordMuscle, LLC. | Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. | FordMuscle.com is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.