UPDATE: Project '67 Dyno Results (331 NA and 331 SuperCharged)
Have thought of doing this to my 289 in the past (afraid the cast pistons won't hold up). Does it run very rich at idle? Always figured it would be hard to get the carb to match the fuel needs as the boost increases. Loved this project since it was the 400 horse 302. It keeps getting better.[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_tup.gif[/img]
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: 289nate on 7/13/04 3:35am ]</font>
I especially like the "on the fly" jetting/air fuel adjustments. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_tup.gif[/img]
<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>This is not to say that the 750 cfm rating is the limiting factor, but rather the carbs ability to meter the proper amount of fuel for the amount of air being consumed by the supercharged engine.</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>
Holley recommends a 40-50% increase in cfm over a n/a application. Do you think that is "over-kill" or reasonable?
[addsig]
UPDATE: Project '67 Dyno Results (331 NA and 331 SuperCharged)
Turbos seem to be all the rave now. Any chance of you trying a turbo on Project '67 in the future? I know you've still got work to do dialing in the S/C, but it may be fun to compare your results with a comparable turbo later on. Just a thaught...