|
04-13-2008, 02:04 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
retyler
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,542
|
Steering Radius
This is a question for you guys who have converted your '65 and older Falcons to disk brakes, whether you use the Granada, Mustang, Maverick or after market. This would not pertain to '66 and newer cars because there is a substantial difference in the frame structure.
1: Did your turning radius change? How much? Shorter or longer.
2. What parts did you use? Another Ford or after market?
3. Will misalignment of caster and camber affect the steering radius? I will also ask this in the tech forum. This is important to know, because I have not had my front end aligned since changing everything around and I don't want to go through the alignment if I decide I have to change some things. I do have the toe in set very close and the car seems to track down the road decently and there is no noticeable tire wear after a couple hundred miles. I measured the tread today.
The reason I'm asking this is because when I changed to the '73 Mustang disk brakes my steering radius changed drastically. It takes a couple of attempts to park in places where it shouldn't. I have to make a long arc when turning in town. It was like this even before I installed the R and P.
I'm thinking there must be a significant difference in the steering arms on the spindles, but can't seem to figure it out. There is nothing binding and they swing very close to the stops.
Any constructive help would be very much appreciated.
______________________________________
"Tell it like it is or don't tell it at all" 1964 Falcon 2dr HT, 347V8 4V, dual exhaust, 5sp, pwr assist R&P steering, AM radio, heater with defrost and 2sp fan, electric windshield wipers, cigar lighter, dlx light group, bucket seats, console and full carpet.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 01:11 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
retyler
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,542
|
Re: Steering Radius
I can't believe I'm the only one that has put disk brakes on their Falcon. Maybe I should ask the same question to the Mustang and Fairlane guys.
______________________________________
"Tell it like it is or don't tell it at all" 1964 Falcon 2dr HT, 347V8 4V, dual exhaust, 5sp, pwr assist R&P steering, AM radio, heater with defrost and 2sp fan, electric windshield wipers, cigar lighter, dlx light group, bucket seats, console and full carpet.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 03:56 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
65FalconLover
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 71
|
Re: Steering Radius
My car has Stainless Steel Brake Co. front discs but I didn't do the swap. I can't imagine how a brake swap would effect the turning radius though.
Are you thinking that the spindles are somehow different in design that they bind up somewhere?
______________________________________
'65 Falcon Futura (weekend cruiser) Built 289, C4, TCI Street Master 3000 stall narrowed 9-inch and 4 wheel disc brakes. It's not a race car but its raced (a little) and its not a show car but we show it.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 06:30 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
69fury
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 117
|
Re: Steering Radius
if you did a spindle swap and nothing else (steering box, pitman arm) then there must be a difference in the length of the steering arms on the spindles themselves. it's just a leverage length issue. if you put a shorter pitman on the steering box or the spindles have longer steering arms then yes it would increase your radius. the rack and pinion will always make it a ten point u turner as you cant get as much tie rod movement off an r&p.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 06:53 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
retyler
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,542
|
Re: Steering Radius
I've considered all those thoughts before. I'm just thinking there is a difference in the size of the steering arms on the spindles. I was wondering if there was a difference in the Granada or Maverick.
Maybe someone who has used them will chime in.
The spindles don't bind. Would the caster and camber have an effect.
______________________________________
"Tell it like it is or don't tell it at all" 1964 Falcon 2dr HT, 347V8 4V, dual exhaust, 5sp, pwr assist R&P steering, AM radio, heater with defrost and 2sp fan, electric windshield wipers, cigar lighter, dlx light group, bucket seats, console and full carpet.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 08:56 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
69fury
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 117
|
Re: Steering Radius
Quote:
Originally Posted by retyler
I've considered all those thoughts before. I'm just thinking there is a difference in the size of the steering arms on the spindles. I was wondering if there was a difference in the Granada or Maverick.
Maybe someone who has used them will chime in.
The spindles don't bind. Would the caster and camber have an effect.
|
shouldn't have any effect on turning especially at parking speeds.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 10:42 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
1bad6t
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 682
|
Re: Steering Radius
I though I answered this post last night, now I don't see it.
Did you trim your steering stops like they say on some websites? I didn’t.
I didn’t loose any turning radius. I used Granada spindles and 63 V8 suspension. As you know the 63 early 64 is different than the late 64-65 (V8 cars only). I did swap the Falcon inter tie rod on the outside and Granada outer tie rod on the inside because the angle looked more correct when stabbing the spindle. The angle of the tie rod sleeve looked more level too. I do not experience any Bump Steer that I’m aware of. The 70 and up Mustang (69 have smaller bearings), Maverick and Granada are the same spindle as far as I know. If the steering box is not center when installing tie rods you will be able to turn sharp one way and loose the turning radius the other because you run out of gear in the steering box.
______________________________________
Jeff in Georgia
60 Tudor Falcon V8
64 Falcon Wagon V8
|
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 12:44 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Iethiopian
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 991
|
Re: Steering Radius
Shelby drop, granada conversion, granada outers, mustang inners, gt box w/16:1 ratio, 65 falcon center link (manual steering of course), branda quick steer and bearings on pitman and idler, tcp struts, gw heavy duty arms and opentracker roller perches. No bump steer and I did not modify the stops.I think my radius is tighter than before.
Ras Daniel 
|
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 06:28 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
retyler
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,542
|
Re: Steering Radius
Thanks,
Must me the difference in size or geometry of the spindles. I'm using 73 Mustang. I'll do some research.
Guess this is research.
______________________________________
"Tell it like it is or don't tell it at all" 1964 Falcon 2dr HT, 347V8 4V, dual exhaust, 5sp, pwr assist R&P steering, AM radio, heater with defrost and 2sp fan, electric windshield wipers, cigar lighter, dlx light group, bucket seats, console and full carpet.
|
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 07:47 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
dnhracing
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 242
|
Re: Steering Radius
are you running long tube headers, my tri y headers interfer with my idler arm and has decreased my turn radius do to steering linkage travel limits.
______________________________________
1961 Falcon 331 stroker T5
torque makes me happy
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:22 AM.
|
|