|
OU812...intake runner angle
OU812,
I have noticed in several of your post and one to me that the angle of the intake runner on the intake vs. the angle of the intake runner on the head is very critical as far as flow is concerned.
I have a set of ported A3 motorsport heads and a Edelbrock 351Y which is ported by the Nascar guys that I am going to try and mate together.
The Intake runner angle in relation to the flange or mounting surface where it makes contact with the head is as follows. The roof angle is 0 deg. on the inner 2 runners on each side of the intake and 3 deg. up angle on the outer 2 runners on each side of the intake. The floor of the intake is 7 deg. up angle on all ports.
The head roof angle is 7 deg. down and the floor is 4 deg. up angle.
Just to note the A331 intake that I have is unported and is supose to match the A3 head has a 4 deg. up angle and a 7 deg. floor angle.
I will be milling the flange of the Edelbrock 351Y about .250 on each side of the intake because when it is installed on a 9.2 block with the A3 heads there is about a .250 interference between the intake port and the head intake port, the intake being too high.
Can you give me your thoughts on these angles and if they will be OK> Seems that there is no match as far as angles are concerned, however it may be that I don't know what to look for or what the intake is trying to do in relation to the head port itself. Also, should I leave the intake a little high or set it lower based on the angles listed above to better the flow?
Then again, this may seperated the men from the boys!!
Thanks
[addsig]
|