sn-95 vs fox

does anyone know the pros. and cons of them [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img]

I assume your comparing the FOX vs. a 5.0 SN95?

Major pros & cons that I'll point out:

SN95 Pros: 5-lug bolt pattern, better brake system w/ 4-wheel discs, more fender room for larger tires.

SN95 Cons: Heavier overall weight, Hypereutectic stock pistons ('93 FOX also), less aggresive computer calibration.

Interior and exterior styling is a matter of preference and opinion. However, there is a larger selection of exterior "dress-up" parts available for the SN95.

I personally like the performance of the lightweight FOX, but really like the looks of the '95 Cobra R (front bumper cover, hood, and wheels) or the SN95 Saleen's.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: 87stang on 5/1/04 2:47am ]</font>

Sn95 also has a much stiffer chassis.

so if i was to say iv got a 532 ci. motor sitting around and both cars with would you choose [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img]

532?!

I'd say it wouldn't matter...

Go with whatever you can find, or like.

<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2004-04-30 16:12, blown33 wrote:
so if i was to say iv got a 532 ci. motor sitting around and both cars with would you choose [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img]
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>
Something else. IMHO too much weight, too high up in the chassis. I'm strictly a small block man.

well i used to think that but i had a 86 with a mild 460 and it would run mid 11s like nothing and the cost to build a good dependable small block at 800 hp is twice of a big block and maint. is twice as much so im going to try the big block its all theory so will see ? [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img][img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]

Ain't no replacment for displacement[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_tup.gif[/img]
[addsig]

<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2004-04-30 15:41, 1 Bad 88 GT wrote:
Sn95 also has a much stiffer chassis.
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>

Its somthin like 55% stiffer, thats why I went with it!!!!!
[addsig]

<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2004-05-01 10:14, fxcomet wrote:
Ain't no replacment for displacement[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_tup.gif[/img]

</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>

couldn't have said it better myself[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_tup.gif[/img]