Tech Department Project Cars FM Store FMWire ReadersCars Feature Cars Forums Log in About FordMuscle
pix
FordMuscle WebMagazine - Home
FordMuscle Home
FordMuscle Login
Subscribe

Go Back   FordMuscle.com Forums > Model Specific Forums > Mustang Pages (1965-1973)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
07-24-2005, 05:52 AM   #1 (permalink)
68Coop
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 12
Heads and Cam ???

[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]OK guys, I want to upgade my heads, but am still in the learning process about all this. I've seen good things said for the GT 40, and AR 165's. I want low end power, I guess, since my carb and intake are for top-end. I will also be going 350/355's on the rear, and I guess it should be first, but I don't really have a clue as to where to start, or what I need. If you have any ideas or comments, please feel free to speak your mind. Thanks
[addsig]
68Coop is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising


   
07-24-2005, 07:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
69convert
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,940
Heads and Cam ???

Is this a daily driver just looking for more power kind of deal? If I were just looking to wake up a 289 and had a bunch of other projects I wanted to do too, I'd probably lose the Performer for an RPM, then run the AFR 165s and something like the COMP XE268H, then the 3.50 gears. It depends on what you really want to do, though - if you think you're going to wind up still wanting more and have a sort of "some day" plan for it, your plan should probably reflect that in the beginning or you'll wind up spending a lot of money twice, from the front of the car all the way back. In that case, I'd just do the gears and figure out exactly what you eventually want from your engine and build that, even if it takes a while longer.

<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2005-07-24 04:52, 68Coop wrote:
I want low end power, I guess, since my carb and intake are for top-end.</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>

Not sure what you mean here?

_________________


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: 69convert on 7/25/05 6:25am ]</font>
69convert is offline   Reply With Quote
07-25-2005, 11:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
68Coop
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 12
Heads and Cam ???

<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE> Yeah, it's my daily driver. I guess my carb intake is better at high rpm's, I don't know what I'm trying to say exactly. When I got that combo, it was with a cam upgrade in mind, but I never thought to ask about the heads. Would some of the better 351 heads work OK??? For now, I will have to settle for the most I can get out of this and stay around stock. My next moter will be a stroked 351. Anyway, I guess the 270 cam and SOME kind of head will be put on there. I will get the gears first, sice I will have to get them anyway.
On 2005-07-24 18:24, 69convert wrote:
Is this a daily driver just looking for more power kind of deal? If I were just looking to wake up a 289 and had a bunch of other projects I wanted to do too, I'd probably lose the Performer for an RPM, then run the AFR 165s and something like the COMP XE268H, then the 3.50 gears. It depends on what you really want to do, though - if you think you're going to wind up still wanting more and have a sort of "some day" plan for it, your plan should probably reflect that in the beginning or you'll wind up spending a lot of money twice, from the front of the car all the way back. In that case, I'd just do the gears and figure out exactly what you eventually want from your engine and build that, even if it takes a while longer.

<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2005-07-24 04:52, 68Coop wrote:
I want low end power, I guess, since my carb and intake are for top-end.</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>

Not sure what you mean here?

_________________


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: 69convert on 7/25/05 6:25am ]</font>
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_cool.gif[/img][img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_cool.gif[/img]
[addsig]
68Coop is offline   Reply With Quote
07-25-2005, 01:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Luv70sFords
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,137
Heads and Cam ???

well first off, the carb and intake is perfectly suited for average, daily driver RPM. The performer intake is not much more than a stock replacment 4v intake. Its designed to work best between idle and about 4000 RPM. If you want a daily driver, pick a small cam. If you want it to still sound like it has authority, pick one with a tight lobe separation. something in the 110 will still give a small amount of chop to the idle.


[addsig]
Luv70sFords is offline   Reply With Quote
07-25-2005, 02:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
69convert
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,940
Heads and Cam ???

My thoughts exactly. The problem you're going to run into is that you're probably going to find that you want to upgrade the rear to a 9" at some point, so the money you spend on the gears will be down the tubes, and if you go with a 351, especially a stroker, the heads, cam, etc, will be sunk too. (Trust me, I've been down that road myself [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_lol.gif[/img])

If you can . . . maybe find a 351W now in decent condition, and put AFR 185s or even 205s and the XE274 if you're sure you're going to stroke it, and go from there? Not to say you can't build a screamer 289, but it doesn't sound like that's the route you want to go - you'll get better street manners with more cubes to get you where you want to be.
[addsig]
69convert is offline   Reply With Quote
07-25-2005, 04:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
68Coop
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 12
Heads and Cam ???

I see what you guys mean, might as well just do this one with what I got. The 289 will get on, but you know how it is, what can I do to get MORE hp is always in the back of my mind. So, if I go wityh a 270 cam, and some AR 160's, the carb/intake combo would work against the rest of it??? Sorry, but I just want to be absolutely sure before I comit to someone about the order. Thanks for the time and info everyone.[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_bow.gif[/img]
[addsig]
68Coop is offline   Reply With Quote
07-25-2005, 04:51 PM   #7 (permalink)
69convert
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,940
Heads and Cam ???

I really think you'd be happy with the AFR165s, the XE268 Comp cam, and a performer RPM intake. The carb might be enough . . . you'd have a responsive, mean sounding street machine that's not too tempermental.

http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Cu...HTML/68-75.asp

EDIT: I should have added that you're not going to HATE that performer if it's not something you're going to be able to change just now - they get a lot of bad press, but I ran one on a 350 chebby years ago, in a BIG '56 Chevy body, with a 600 VS Holley, that ran low 13s, even breaking into the 12s.
_________________


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: 69convert on 7/26/05 3:58am ]</font>
69convert is offline   Reply With Quote
07-25-2005, 07:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
68Coop
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 12
Heads and Cam ???

[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] Thank you very much, that's what I'm shooting for. I don't want to be under the hood ALL the time.
[addsig]
68Coop is offline   Reply With Quote
08-05-2005, 03:47 PM   #9 (permalink)
EricButler
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 219
Heads and Cam ???

For Cylinder heads look into the trick flow heads. They are just as good as the AFR 165s and cheaper. They will work great with that engine you have now and you will have tons of room to grow with them should you decide to later. Just send those suckers to Total Engine Airflow for a CNC porting job if you ever do the 351 stroker. I don't know if you could grow that much with the AFR 165's since they already have the CNC porting done to them, I have never seen any of the head porting places advertise any type of stage CNC porting programs for the AFR'S. You would probably have to buy a whole new set of heads if you went with the AFR 165's and you wanted a bigger badder engine later down the road.
[addsig]
EricButler is offline   Reply With Quote
08-05-2005, 06:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
68Coop
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 12
Heads and Cam ???

[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] Thanks Eric, I'll check into the Trick Flows. I like saving money, even better if I am getting just as good a product, or better.[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_razz.gif[/img]
[addsig]
68Coop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
pixblue
Powerhouse products

All content © FordMuscle, LLC. | Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. | FordMuscle.com is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.