Tech Department Project Cars FM Store FMWire ReadersCars Feature Cars Forums Log in About FordMuscle
pix
FordMuscle WebMagazine - Home
FordMuscle Home
FordMuscle Login
Subscribe

Go Back   FordMuscle.com Forums > Model Specific Forums > Mustang Pages (1979-1995)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
02-25-2006, 01:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
yacobco5
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 15
ECU for a 351W cam in a 5.0 engine

My son put a 351W compcam (pn 35-560-[img]/forums/images/smiles/icon_cool.gif[/img] in to a 1990 EFI 5.0. From what I've researched, switching the wires will not be enough, he will need to use a different ECU(ECM). Can I get some confirmation on this, suggestions, and if a new ECM is required, a vendor recommendation.

Thanks.
yacobco5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising


   
02-26-2006, 07:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
Magic
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 297
ECU for a 351W cam in a 5.0 engine

id take that cam back out, and find a cam for an HO motor

[addsig]
Magic is offline   Reply With Quote
02-26-2006, 07:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
dfree383
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,179
ECU for a 351W cam in a 5.0 engine

?? switcing wires ?? What is the cam#? if its a hydraulic roller should't be an issue unless it a really Radical one.
[addsig]
dfree383 is offline   Reply With Quote
02-26-2006, 08:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
1 Bad 88 GT
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,553
ECU for a 351W cam in a 5.0 engine

The cam won't work due to the extreme valve lift(.565"/.580" ) , not an EFI compatibility problem.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: 1 Bad 88 GT on 2/27/06 10:40am ]</font>
1 Bad 88 GT is offline   Reply With Quote
02-28-2006, 11:07 AM   #5 (permalink)
Joel50
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 73
ECU for a 351W cam in a 5.0 engine

5.0 HO's and 351W have same firing order....no problem there, no need to change ECM...need the right valve springs and config to support those lift numbers though.
Joel50 is offline   Reply With Quote
02-28-2006, 11:46 AM   #6 (permalink)
dfree383
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,179
ECU for a 351W cam in a 5.0 engine

Check the clearances and flycut if necessary. Its not the lift thats usually the problem its the duration and timing of the events. (how fast you open the valves)

_________________
1991 LX Mustang 347 C4 combo Mid 11's with the AC on.
1984 Mustang GT 460, Powerglide "Still putting it together" hoping for 9's !!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: dfree383 on 3/1/06 1:46am ]</font>
dfree383 is offline   Reply With Quote
03-17-2006, 10:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
decayforme999
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 23
ECU for a 351W cam in a 5.0 engine

A 5.0 high out put does not have the same firing order as a windor block like a 351 w or a non ho 5.0. You can swap the cams from a ho into a non ho but the block needs to be machined.
[addsig]
decayforme999 is offline   Reply With Quote
03-18-2006, 02:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Joel50
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 73
ECU for a 351W cam in a 5.0 engine

<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
On 2006-03-17 21:12, decayforme999 wrote:
A 5.0 high out put does not have the same firing order as a windor block like a 351 w or a non ho 5.0. You can swap the cams from a ho into a non ho but the block needs to be machined.

</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>

5.0 HO = 351W firing order = 13726548
289/Non-HO 5.0 firing order = 15426378
....they're all Windsor style blocks(289/302/5.0L/351w)

Cams (roller, flat tappets) are interchangeable between all windors block styles, need to get the right lifters though...if you install a roller cam in a non-roller block, have to get the early block hyd. roller lifter type, which don't require any machining of the block.
Joel50 is offline   Reply With Quote
03-27-2006, 12:18 AM   #9 (permalink)
67Coug
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 391
ECU for a 351W cam in a 5.0 engine

351W and 5.0 HO ARE indeed the same firing order. When Ford began putting some life back into the 302 in about 1982, the best cam they had was the 351W marine cam so this went into the first 5.0 HO engines and they've used the 351 W firing order ever since. If you're running the EEC IV efi system, make sure the cam is computer compatible. Computer controlled systems don't like a lot of duration and overlap, even on mass air systems. Call Comp to get their recommendations.
67Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
pixblue
Flowmaster Mufflers
Maradyne Electric Fans

All content © FordMuscle, LLC. | Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. | FordMuscle.com is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.