Detroit’s Undoing?

Steve Turner
January 12, 2009


Eastwood’s Gran Torino, the movie, opened this weekend with major success grossing 29 million in box office sales, reported the LA Times. Great news. However, the same media source ran this story adjacent to the positive box office report which cited that the 1972 Gran Torino is partly responsible for Detroit’s undoing. Here are a list of tasty morsels from LA Times writer and self-proclaimed “car guy” Dan Niel’s article “The Gran Torino, a perfect symbol for the movie”. Enjoy.

– So to say Walt Kowalski’s (Eastwood) Gran Torino is a cinematic metaphor doesn’t really do it justice. The car — to whatever extent it is fractionally responsible for Detroit’s undoing.

– One day in 1972 Walt is wrenching away on a Ford assembly line, stuffing a steering box into a shiny Gran Torino before going home to a comfortable middle-class home on a quiet street in Highland Park. Thirty-six years later, he raises the blinds of that same house to discover the world he knew is gone. The jobs have vanished, the factories closed, the prosperity replaced with desperation. How did he get here? The answer is in the garage.

– The title character in Clint Eastwood’s Motor City morality tale is, by the reaching light of history, a fairly negligible hunk of machinery: a green 1972 Ford Gran Torino Sport.

– You could prowl vintage car shows for years and not find an automobile that, in its malign typicality, better summarizes Detroit’s fall than the 1972 Gran Torino.

– Let’s begin with the thing itself: The car was tubby and it was awkward. It handled like a block of ice with a steering wheel. It lacked even minimum corrosion proofing and so rusted with relish in northern climates. That this oaf of a car should be given the sporty-sounding but nonsensical Italian name Gran Torino — meaning “great Turin” — is a bleak joke.

– The previous model-year car was built on a unitized steel chassis, or monocoque, like modern cars. For 1972, the Torino returned to a virtually obsolete and inferior body-on-frame design, which lowered the costs of putting multiple body styles on the chassis.

– You could blame Ford’s penny-chiseling management for the Torino’s mediocrity.